Prompt Templates
Add assorted AI prompts in this file to expedite glossary workflows.
Annotated Screenshots
- Attach published annotated screenshot examples
- Attach current glossary term entry for context
- Edit and execute the following:
I'm working on the API Docs Glossary. Here are links to the GitHub
repository project and its rendered docs:
https://github.com/rhyannonjoy/api-docs-glossary
https://rhyannonjoy.github.io/api-docs-glossary/
I'd like to create an annotated screenshot for the `[glossary term]`
entry. What do you think should be annotated in this new screenshot?
Please create a Markdown table legend of components that you think
should be annotated in the screenshot. I've added an example annotated
screenshot for a published glossary term entry.
Mermaid Diagrams
- Attach current glossary term for context
- Edit and execute the following:
Please help me decide what will be the most impactful Mermaid diagram for
this glossary **Example** field scenario. I'm thinking a `[diagram type]`
diagram. Ensure that your output is in Markdown and Mermaid format, so that
I can copy and paste it easily.
Note: flowcharts TD tend to take up too much site real estate and flowcharts RL tend to not be readable without wrapping it in a zoom component
New Glossary Term Entries
- Attach Style Guide
- Attach preferred sources
- Edit and execute the following:
I’d like to add a glossary term entry to my API Docs Glossary:
https://github.com/rhyannonjoy/api-docs-glossary
Terms to add:
* [Term 1]
* [Term 2]
* [Term 3]
I think these terms should go in [FILENAME], in the [SECTION NAME] section,
do you agree?
Please follow the Style Guide recommendations
[paste or link to [Style Guide](style-guide.mdx)] - write in active voice and
generate output in Markdown so that I can copy and paste it easily. Use the
following sources:
* [Source URL 1]
* [Source URL 2]
* [Source URL 3]
Ensure that the **Example** scenario is realistic and practical.
Note: Be as specific as possible. If you have questions, communicate them with reasoning, "I'm thinking of filing the term into
[category and/or subcategory], because it fundamentally describes[reason]- do you agree?" This may lead to expanding the entry to include placement reasoning or visual components to accurately represent the term.
Standardizing Existing Entries
Please review these glossary entries against Style Guide recommendations
[paste or link to [Style Guide](style-guide.mdx)] and suggest improvements:
Term entries to review:
* [Term Entry 1]
* [Term Entry 2]
* [Term Entry 3]
Focus on capitalization rules, definition clarity, formatting consistency,
and **Related Terms** anchor linking